Why update the zoning code?

Livingston’s zoning code helps shape how our community grows and develops. It decides where homes, businesses, and public spaces can go and sets rules for building and planning. As our city changes and grows, it’s important to update these regulations to reflect what our community values and needs are today.

Right now, our zoning code is outdated and doesn’t fully address today’s challenges or opportunities, like:

  • Creating affordable housing and offering more housing choices
  • Protecting Livingston’s special character and natural beauty
  • Supporting sustainable and balanced growth
  • Encouraging economic development while caring for the environment

Updating our zoning code gives us a chance to plan for the future, tackle important issues like housing, transportation, and environmental protection, and ensure our community continues to offer a high quality of life for all residents.

We want to hear from you! This is your chance to help shape Livingston’s future by sharing your ideas. Together, we can create zoning rules that support a thriving, welcoming, and sustainable community.


Protecting our scenic views

Livingston, MT, is famous for its beautiful natural scenery and breathtaking views. As we work on updating our zoning code, we want your input on the places that should be protected for future generations.

Viewsheds are the landscapes you can see from a specific spot, and they play a big part in making our city special.

We need your help to identify the areas that matter most. Use the interactive map to mark the spots where you think viewshed protection should be a priority. Tell us why these views are important to you and our community—whether for recreation, tourism, cultural heritage, or simply everyday enjoyment.

Your feedback will help us create policies that protect Livingston’s stunning views while supporting thoughtful and responsible growth.

Livingston view example

Shaping the Livingston Skyline

Did you know that there are no building height limits in downtown Livingston? As part of the zoning code update, we’re considering whether rules on building heights should be added to help preserve the charm of our historic downtown.

Livingston’s downtown is special because of its unique character, community spaces, and distinctive buildings. We want to hear from you to make sure future development reflects our community’s values while allowing for growth.

What do you think the maximum building height should be? Should it change depending on the location or type of building? Share your ideas and help us shape a downtown skyline that respects Livingston’s small-town charm while planning for the future.

Discuss your thoughts about building heights in downtown Livingston.

You have 140 characters left
Moderation Policy

7 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

Building up to 5 stories is the way to go to prevent urban sprawl, but PARKING is going to have to be addressed. There's zero parking now.

7 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

If we don't want sprawl, there's only one way...up!

4 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

Nothing should exceed the height of our existing buildings. Bozeman is that way ———>

4 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

The code must clearly define what does and does not count toward max height (e.g., parapet walls, cupolas, solar panels, etc.)

2 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

Topographic decline toward the floodplain can easily accommodate five story structures and maintain consistent apparent height with downtown

27 February, 2025

Anonymous says:

Building heights and massing should complement existing historic structures and create a comfortable pedestrian realm.

27 February, 2025

Anonymous says:

Building heights should be kept low, close to historical heights for multiple reasons. Views, historical character, less need for parking...

27 February, 2025

Anonymous says:

Building heights should definitely be kept to a minimum so when walking down the sidewalk it doesn’t seem too overwhelming.

27 February, 2025

Anonymous says:

Allowing 5 story buildings in the downtown area will help create a vibrant, walkable business district.

26 February, 2025

Anonymous says:

Urban sprawl is the death of agriculture. I would much rather see taller buildings in a city center than farm acres chopped up for housing.

26 February, 2025

Anonymous says:

I think alignment with existing brick facades will create a streamline affect.

26 February, 2025

Anonymous says:

Buildings should be 3 stories. We all moved here to enjoy the mountain views and it's pretty much pointless if we can't enjoy the views.


Exploring Opportunities for Mixed-Use and Commercial Development on the North Side

The north side of Livingston, beyond the train tracks, has a lot of potential for new development and redevelopment. As part of the zoning code update, we’re considering adding options for mixed-use or commercial development in this area.

Mixed-use development brings together homes, businesses, and sometimes recreational spaces, creating lively, walkable neighborhoods.

We want to hear your thoughts! What parts of the north side do you think would be best for businesses, mixed-use development, redevelopment, or other types of growth? Your input will help us make zoning decisions that support smart, sustainable growth and meet the needs of our community

Commercial Example
Follow-up Question: For any new commercial-related development on the north side of Livingston, should there be more mixed-use development, more commercial-only development, a combination of both, or no new commercial development?

Planning for Livingston’s Housing Future: Higher-Density and Mixed Residential Development

As Livingston grows, we need to plan for housing that fits the needs of everyone in our community. Building higher-density housing, like townhomes, multi-family, and live-work spaces, can give people more options while making good use of land and resources.

Tow home example

Townhome Example

Multi-family housing

Multi-family Housing Example

Live work example

Live-work Development Example


Industrial Development in Livingston

Industrial development plays a key role in Livingston’s economy, providing jobs and supporting local businesses. As we update the zoning code, we’re looking at the best areas for future industrial use.

Industrial areas can include things like manufacturing, warehouses, and logistics. Choosing the right locations means considering access to transportation, keeping a safe distance from neighborhoods, and how these uses fit with nearby areas.

We want to hear from you! What parts of Livingston do you think are best for industrial development, and why? Your input will help us create zoning policies that support economic growth while meeting the needs of our community.

Light Manufacturing

Light manufacturing refers to industrial activities that involve the assembly, processing, or production of goods in a way that typically generates minimal noise, vibration, air pollution, or heavy traffic. These activities often take place indoors and are designed to be compatible with adjacent commercial, mixed-use, or even residential zones.

Examples include: Food processing, assembly facilities, textile production, and printing.

Warehousing and logistics

Warehousing and logistics refer to land uses and facilities designed for the storage, distribution, and transportation of goods.

Examples include: Distribution centers, packing facilities, and general warehouses.

Tech or green industry

Tech or green industries represent sectors focused on innovative technologies and environmentally sustainable practices

Examples include: Data centers, greenhouses, hydroponic farming, and hardware manufacturing.

Discuss your thoughts on the future of industrial development in Livingston. (max 140 characters).

You have 140 characters left
Moderation Policy

7 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

Community College or Trade School! We need higher paying jobs for the people who live here and we need to offer a path towards skilled labor

5 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

Increased residential density in center of town should be highest priority. Reduce cars.

3 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

There already is a lack of affordable housing of people to reside. Why encourage large stores, what basic needs does that cover?

27 February, 2025

lilcroc says:

Zoning should support a walkable, mixed-use environment.

27 February, 2025

lilcroc says:

The code update should prioritize density instead of sprawl. Development in downtown should complement and coexist with historical assets.

27 February, 2025

JA says:

Prioritizing tourism/local economy - walkability, historical preservation, general charm - is most important to me & great for residents too

27 February, 2025

Ellen S says:

l would like to see architectural & landscaping guidelines so the facades of new retail or work/live are not just a big ugly boxes.

27 February, 2025

KA says:

Existing commercial/shop buildings within the city limits should be allowed to use their infrastructure for a light commercial use.

26 February, 2025

christina says:

I'd prefer to drive to Bozeman for large scale retail stores. I can order stuff online. I do not want this in our town.

25 February, 2025

PS says:

not all development on N side will increase traffic over RRxing. Some services may reduce need to cross tracks (grocery/market, coffee, etc)

25 February, 2025

Paul Hook says:

Deal with the RR underpass/overpass ASAP. This has been going on for decades. Bite the bullet. Northside developers should help pay.

25 February, 2025

Paul Hook says:

Be realistic about expectations for growth. Putting our heads in the sand will result in worse outcomes than planning for inevitable growth.


Large Scale Retail in Livingston

Large-scale retail businesses are defined in Livingston’s Municipal Code as commercial space that is 20,000 square feet or larger, not including parking. These stores often offer a wide range of products and services, but they also bring up important questions about how they fit with Livingston’s character, economy, and infrastructure.

What do you think? Should large-scale commercial stores have a place in Livingston? If so, where do you think they should go? Consider things like traffic, accessibility, the effect on small businesses, and how they might shape the unique character of our community.

Your feedback will play a key role in helping us decide whether and how large-scale commercial stores could be part of Livingston’s future.

Example of Existing Large Scale Retail: Murdoch's Ranch & Home Supply

Quick Poll

Do you think Livingston should encourage large scale retail development?
If yes, where do you think large scale retail stores should be located?

Any other thoughts?

Do you have any other thoughts or ideas you wish to share related to the Livingston zoning code update? (max 140 characters).

You have 140 characters left
Moderation Policy

7 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

Community College or Trade School! We need higher paying jobs for the people who live here and we need to offer a path towards skilled labor

5 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

Increased residential density in center of town should be highest priority. Reduce cars.

3 March, 2025

Anonymous says:

There already is a lack of affordable housing of people to reside. Why encourage large stores, what basic needs does that cover?

27 February, 2025

lilcroc says:

Zoning should support a walkable, mixed-use environment.

27 February, 2025

lilcroc says:

The code update should prioritize density instead of sprawl. Development in downtown should complement and coexist with historical assets.

27 February, 2025

JA says:

Prioritizing tourism/local economy - walkability, historical preservation, general charm - is most important to me & great for residents too

27 February, 2025

Ellen S says:

l would like to see architectural & landscaping guidelines so the facades of new retail or work/live are not just a big ugly boxes.

27 February, 2025

KA says:

Existing commercial/shop buildings within the city limits should be allowed to use their infrastructure for a light commercial use.

26 February, 2025

christina says:

I'd prefer to drive to Bozeman for large scale retail stores. I can order stuff online. I do not want this in our town.

25 February, 2025

PS says:

not all development on N side will increase traffic over RRxing. Some services may reduce need to cross tracks (grocery/market, coffee, etc)

25 February, 2025

Paul Hook says:

Deal with the RR underpass/overpass ASAP. This has been going on for decades. Bite the bullet. Northside developers should help pay.

25 February, 2025

Paul Hook says:

Be realistic about expectations for growth. Putting our heads in the sand will result in worse outcomes than planning for inevitable growth.

Keep in touch!

Please provide your name and email address below to stay up to date on the zoning code update!